Ameresco report touts potential, challenges of flow batteries in military microgrid energy storage

By Rod Walton for Power Engineering

Flow battery technology in energy storage could eventually replace or compete with diesel generation and lithium-ion as part of a microgrid package but needs to improve on load reliability and cost-competitiveness.

This conclusion ends a new report by renewables and energy efficiency firm Ameresco. The company is working with 2ndPath Energy on the U.S. Department of Defense-funded research into vanadium redox flow (VRF) battery energy storage systems as an alternative for diesel generators (DG) in microgrid applications.

“First, based on an assessment of the reliability modeling results and critical load coverage curves produced, we can conclude that a VRF battery enabled microgrid can provide satisfactory reliability performance at all five sites by meeting the baseline performance requirement over a 168-hour outage that could occur at any time,” reads an executive summary of the Ameresco-2ndPath Energy report.

“However, we can also conclude for all five sites that critical load coverage at 168 hours was below the variable load DG-only coverage by between 1.6% to 3.0%,” the executive summary added. “This is to be expected since the newer VRF technology is assumed to have lower reliability factors that the DG technology.”

Vanadium redox battery technology utilizes the ability of vanadium ions in solutions in various oxidation states to store potential energy. It has been studied for years but has not found a way to market at scale.

Lithium-ion battery technology, meanwhile, dominates the energy storage landscape and makes up more than 90 percent of the U.S. battery storage installed capacity. VRB offers the potential for a competitive, comparative solution but not yet.

“From an economic standpoint, results show that there is also an opportunity for large scale storage to provide a lower cost of critical load coverage ($/kWh) under certain conditions,” the report reads. “However, due to today’s VRF BESS equipment pricing higher operating costs, there is not a clearly established case for a VRF BESS providing a preferable technology solution to Li-Ion BESS technology. It is important to recognize that VRF BESS technology is early on in its development and deployment lifecycle and has not yet appreciated the vast cost reductions due to the economy of scale that Li-Ion has enjoyed.”

Phase 1 of the study was focused on the analytical modeling and research stage. If approved, the study would move to Phase 2 on hardware in the loop testing and, finally, a Phase 3 with a trial demonstration in the field.

The information contained in this article and provided by VanadiumCorp is sourced from third-party content in the public domain and is for general information purposes only, with no representation, guarantees of completeness, warranty of any kind, express or implied regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, availability, completeness, usefulness or timeliness of any information contained within. Please also excuse any syntax as authors and reposted articles are sourced from global origins. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL WE HAVE LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY KIND INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE USE OF THIS REPOSTED ARTICLE. THE USE OF THIS ARTICLE AND YOUR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK. VANADIUMCORP ALSO ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN THE CONTENT OF THIS ARTICLE.

Continue reading the full story here >>

This Post Has 0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *