Disruptive Technology for Energy Storage to Steel Production
The progress of global deployment and commercialization
Vanadium, Iron and Titanium recovered from Multiple Sources Efficiently and Sustainably
Development VTM Resource with 22.5km Geophysical Footprint
Former Crown Asset With Over 60yrs of Development next to Blackrock Metals Proposed VTM Mine and Concentrator
Copper Gold Exploration Projects and Royalties Available For Option or Sale
The Future of Sustainable Energy
Reusable and Lowest Cost Battery Electrolyte without Carbon
Current Demand and Price for Vanadium
Board of Directors, Advisory Board & Technical Team
Green process technologies to unlock critical metal supply
Strategic Partners and Memberships
Current Mandates and Pending Developments
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Presentations about Vanadium, Redox Battery Flow and more
Aug 22, 2017
By Editors of Power Engineering
The study, which examined solar systems in Southern California, indicated the cost of the batteries along with 2014 solar electricity prices caused the cost-benefit ratio to fall well short of standalone solar arrays.
Though AC-coupled and DC-coupled systems increased the cost-benefit ratio slightly, even 30 percent investment tax credits only pushed the ratio to just below 1.4. Photovoltaic solar alone had a cost-benefit ratio of slightly above 1.4.
As the energy storage market continues to mature, battery costs should fall. However, the study indicated energy storage would provide a much better cost to benefit ratio in areas with higher photovoltaic penetrations than solar alone by 2020. Solar plus storage would show a cost-benefit ratio mostly similar to solar alone, not including investment tax credits.
Enter your email address below to start receiving VanadiumCorp and related Industry news directly.
We're here to answer your questions. Contact us by phone or email.
© 2019 VanadiumCorp Resource Inc., all rights reserved • Site Map • By Line49 Web Design, Vancouver BC